WebJan 28, 2014 · Supported types when it comes to sorting with git tag are: refname - sorts in a lexicographic order; version:refname or v:refname - this sorts based on versions; The solution to your problem would look like: git tag -l --sort version:refname. There are many more useful commands related to git tagging, be sure to check this article out for more ... Web16 static int check_ref(const char *name, int len, unsigned int flags)
Git - git-tag Documentation
WebLocalized versions of git-show-ref manual. English; Português (Brasil) ... and we want to use the full refname for it in order to not trigger the problem with ambiguous partial matches). To show only tags, or only proper branch heads, use "--tags" and/or "--heads" respectively … WebActually you also get local branches, tags, notes and perhaps some more stuff. You can restrict it to remote branches: git for-each-ref --sort=committerdate --format='% (committerdate) %09 % (authorname) %09 % (refname)' refs/remotes. Since there is no sort command any more you can run it in cmd again after adjusting the quoting of the format ... schwan\u0027s recipes
Git warning: refname
WebMerge branch 'rh/prompt-pcmode-avoid-eval-on-refname' / git-svn.perl WebOption 1: Brute force. Use git for-each-ref refs/heads to get all branches, filter on commit, and extract branch names. Option 2: use git name-rev --name-only. However, this only gives only one branch (if multiple branches point to the same commit). Ultimately what I really want is a topo-sorted list of branch names between two commits (where ... WebMay 1, 2014 · Thanks for git branch-status Jehiah, I've created my own (based on lth2h's) which only shows the current branch and only generates output if a branch is ahead or behind.It also adds options to show all branches, show output even if the branch isn't ahead or behind and show help. This is really useful when your application is spread over … schwan\\u0027s ratings review